Ranked by adjusted winrate - flip the Perf column for the worst performers.
| 275 |
| 84.4% |
| 88.7% |
| 1.77% |
| 244 |
| 31 |
| 2.57m |
| 72.56m |
| 1527 |
| 2 | 140 | 80.6% | 87.1% | 0.90% | 122 | 18 | 2.89m | 47.62m | 1622 |
| 3 | 172 | 77.5% | 83.7% | 1.11% | 144 | 28 | 1.41m | 45.26m | 1564 |
| 4 | 52low n | 77.0% | 88.5% | 0.33% | 46 | 6 | 1.50m | 9.94m | 1499 |
| 5 | 90low n | 76.8% | 85.6% | 0.58% | 77 | 13 | 1.48m | 24.16m | 1539 |
| 6 | 51low n | 74.3% | 86.3% | 0.33% | 44 | 7 | 1.98m | 11.14m | 1564 |
| 7 | 80low n | 74.2% | 83.8% | 0.51% | 67 | 13 | 3.96m | 20.75m | 1582 |
| 8 | 78low n | 72.1% | 82.1% | 0.50% | 64 | 14 | 991.4k | 10.13m | 1464 |
| 9 | 56low n | 70.2% | 82.1% | 0.36% | 46 | 10 | 1.62m | 11.94m | 1550 |
| 10 | 58low n | 67.2% | 79.3% | 0.37% | 46 | 12 | 3.03m | 13.71m | 1544 |
| 11 | 171 | 66.0% | 73.1% | 1.10% | 125 | 46 | 1.34m | 58.36m | 1562 |
| 12 | 65low n | 65.4% | 76.9% | 0.42% | 50 | 15 | 1.55m | 8.20m | 1412 |
| 13 | 84low n | 64.8% | 75.0% | 0.54% | 63 | 21 | 1.78m | 22.46m | 1562 |
| 14 | 145 | 61.7% | 69.7% | 0.93% | 101 | 44 | 1.60m | 35.69m | 1535 |
| 15 | 84low n | 61.0% | 71.4% | 0.54% | 60 | 24 | 2.37m | 23.75m | 1590 |
| 16 | 89low n | 60.6% | 70.8% | 0.57% | 63 | 26 | 2.67m | 13.51m | 1493 |
| 17 | 65low n | 58.8% | 70.8% | 0.42% | 46 | 19 | 1.86m | 15.04m | 1562 |
| 18 | 126 | 54.0% | 62.7% | 0.81% | 79 | 47 | 2.67m | 25.34m | 1594 |
| 19 | 74low n | 44.1% | 55.4% | 0.48% | 41 | 33 | 1.86m | 14.41m | 1538 |
| 20 | 56low n | 5.0% | 10.7% | 0.36% | 6 | 50 | 1.38m | 2.98m | 1521 |