Ranked by adjusted winrate - flip the Perf column for the worst performers.
| 159 |
| 82.1% |
| 88.1% |
| 1.09% |
| 140 |
| 19 |
| 2.64m |
| 47.53m |
| 1615 |
| 2 | 60low n | 79.9% | 90.0% | 0.41% | 54 | 6 | 2.79m | 14.01m | 1531 |
| 3 | 66low n | 79.7% | 89.4% | 0.45% | 59 | 7 | 1.79m | 12.15m | 1628 |
| 4 | 129 | 77.3% | 84.5% | 0.88% | 109 | 20 | 3.05m | 26.69m | 1597 |
| 5 | 90low n | 75.6% | 84.4% | 0.62% | 76 | 14 | 2.78m | 22.24m | 1585 |
| 6 | 73low n | 75.0% | 84.9% | 0.50% | 62 | 11 | 3.16m | 14.95m | 1525 |
| 7 | 62low n | 74.7% | 85.5% | 0.42% | 53 | 9 | 1.49m | 7.36m | 1471 |
| 8 | 197 | 71.9% | 78.2% | 1.35% | 154 | 43 | 2.71m | 44.29m | 1540 |
| 9 | 67low n | 71.3% | 82.1% | 0.46% | 55 | 12 | 2.96m | 15.28m | 1594 |
| 10 | 111 | 66.9% | 75.7% | 0.76% | 84 | 27 | 1.39m | 16.03m | 1495 |
| 11 | 57low n | 62.9% | 75.4% | 0.39% | 43 | 14 | 1.88m | 11.85m | 1458 |
| 12 | 90low n | 61.0% | 71.1% | 0.62% | 64 | 26 | 2.83m | 15.16m | 1535 |
| 13 | 242 | 59.1% | 65.3% | 1.66% | 158 | 84 | 2.85m | 63.26m | 1594 |
| 14 | 113 | 59.1% | 68.1% | 0.77% | 77 | 36 | 3.44m | 34.23m | 1623 |
| 15 | 53low n | 54.5% | 67.9% | 0.36% | 36 | 17 | 1.24m | 8.05m | 1525 |
| 16 | 64low n | 5.4% | 10.9% | 0.44% | 7 | 57 | 1.51m | 6.04m | 1488 |